Is Your Term Sheet Binding?

That is the question addressed in Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 894 N.Y.S.2d 47 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep’t Feb. 4, 2010).

Amcan Holdings, Inc. (“Amcan”), certain of Amcan’s affiliates (together with Amcan, collectively, “Borrower”), and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“Lender”) negotiated, executed and delivered a certain “Summary of Terms and Conditions” (the “Term Sheet”). The Term Sheet contained a variety of agreed upon terms and conditions, including the principal amounts of the revolving and term facilities, interest and amortization schedules, maturity dates, fees, the collateral to secure the debt, and a proposed closing date. 

After discovering that Borrower was subject to a preliminary injunction that prohibited Borrower from pledging to Lender certain equity interests, Lender lost interest in the proposed financing arrangement. Six years later, Borrower initiated a breach of contract action against Lender. Borrower’s position was that the Term Sheet was a binding commitment to lend.

The New York appellate court disagreed. The court stated that the fundamental issue to be determined in these cases is whether the parties intended to be bound by the agreed upon terms and conditions set forth in the preliminary agreement (i.e., the Term Sheet). To support its conclusion that the Term Sheet was not binding, the court noted that the Term Sheet clearly states “the credit facilities will only be established upon completion of definitive loan documentation, which would contain not only the terms and conditions in those documents but also such other terms and conditions as [Lender] may reasonably require. Although the [Term Sheet] was detailed in its terms, it was clearly dependent on a future definitive agreement, including a credit agreement. At no point did the parties explicitly state that they intended to be bound by the [Term Sheet] pending the final Credit Agreement, nor did they waive the finalization of such agreement.”    

Based upon this case, a prudent lender should make it clear within the term sheet which provisions, if any, are binding upon the parties. Additionally, the term sheet should indicate that the proposed credit facilities shall not be established, and lender shall not be committed to lend, unless and until the parties execute and deliver definitive loan documentation.

April 2, 2010: Community Banks should consult SEC Small Entity Compliance Guide for Shareholder Disclosure Suggestions

            As you read this, annual meeting season is in full swing. One of the traditional hallmarks of the season is the annual proxy report which firms distribute in advance of the annual meeting. The ostensible purpose of the report is to solicit votes for the slate of directors, usually incumbents, to be elected at such annual meeting. But the broader purpose of the proxy of course is to describe the leadership of the firm, including such things as corporate governance practices, the overall structure of the board of directors, and the background of both management and the board of directors, including their compensation and real and potential conflicts of interest.

            The dramatic business environment over the last few years has led to numerous changes in both the form and the style of proxy disclosures. There is more emphasis now, for example, on what is called “transparency” for shareholders. In practice, this means more disclosures related to compensation and conflicts.

Continue Reading...